When Tropical Storm Melissa was churning off the coast of Haiti, meteorologist Philippe Papin felt certain it would soon escalate to a major tropical system.
As the primary meteorologist on duty, he forecasted that in just 24 hours the storm would intensify into a severe hurricane and begin a turn in the direction of the coast of Jamaica. No forecaster had previously made such a bold forecast for quick intensification.
However, Papin possessed a secret advantage: artificial intelligence in the guise of the tech giant’s new DeepMind cyclone prediction system – launched for the initial occasion in June. True to the forecast, Melissa evolved into a system of remarkable power that ravaged Jamaica.
Forecasters are increasingly leaning hard on the AI system. On the morning of 25 October, Papin explained in his public discussion that Google’s model was a primary reason for his confidence: “Roughly 40/50 Google DeepMind simulation runs show Melissa becoming a Category 5 hurricane. Although I am unprepared to predict that intensity yet given track uncertainty, that remains a possibility.
“There is a high probability that a phase of rapid intensification is expected as the storm drifts over very warm sea temperatures which represent the most extreme oceanic heat content in the entire Atlantic basin.”
The AI model is the pioneer AI model focused on tropical cyclones, and now the initial to beat traditional meteorological experts at their own game. Through all tropical systems so far this year, Google’s model is the best – even beating human forecasters on track predictions.
Melissa eventually made landfall in Jamaica at maximum intensity, among the most powerful coastal impacts recorded in nearly two centuries of record-keeping across the Atlantic basin. Papin’s bold forecast probably provided people in Jamaica additional preparation time to get ready for the catastrophe, potentially preserving people and assets.
Google’s model works by spotting patterns that traditional time-intensive scientific weather models may overlook.
“They do it far faster than their traditional counterparts, and the processing requirements is more affordable and time consuming,” stated Michael Lowry, a ex meteorologist.
“What this hurricane season has proven in short order is that the recent AI weather models are on par with and, in certain instances, more accurate than the less rapid traditional forecasting tools we’ve traditionally leaned on,” he added.
To be sure, Google DeepMind is an instance of AI training – a method that has been employed in data-heavy sciences like weather science for years – and is distinct from generative AI like ChatGPT.
AI training processes large datasets and extracts trends from them in a such a way that its system only takes a few minutes to come up with an answer, and can do so on a desktop computer – in sharp difference to the flagship models that governments have used for years that can take hours to run and need the largest high-performance systems in the world.
Nevertheless, the reality that the AI could exceed earlier top-tier legacy models so quickly is nothing short of amazing to meteorologists who have spent their careers trying to predict the most intense weather systems.
“It’s astonishing,” commented James Franklin, a former expert. “The data is now large enough that it’s evident this is not just chance.”
Franklin said that while the AI is outperforming all competing systems on forecasting the trajectory of storms worldwide this year, like many AI models it sometimes errs on extreme strength predictions wrong. It struggled with Hurricane Erin earlier this year, as it was also undergoing rapid intensification to maximum intensity above the Caribbean.
In the coming offseason, Franklin stated he intends to discuss with the company about how it can enhance the AI results more useful for forecasters by providing additional internal information they can use to evaluate exactly why it is coming up with its answers.
“A key concern that troubles me is that while these forecasts appear highly accurate, the output of the model is essentially a opaque process,” said Franklin.
Historically, no a commercial entity that has produced a top-level weather model which grants experts a peek into its methods – in contrast to nearly all systems which are provided free to the public in their full form by the authorities that designed and maintain them.
The company is not the only one in adopting AI to address challenging weather forecasting problems. The US and European governments also have their own artificial intelligence systems in the works – which have also shown improved skill over previous non-AI versions.
The next steps in AI weather forecasts appear to involve new firms tackling previously difficult problems such as long-range forecasts and improved early alerts of tornado outbreaks and flash flooding – and they have secured federal support to do so. A particular firm, WindBorne Systems, is even launching its proprietary atmospheric sensors to address deficiencies in the national monitoring system.